|
Hewlett-Packard Co. #
210109
HP BladeSystem c7000 vs. Cisco UCS - Network Bandwidth Scalability Comparison
Release date: 25 February 2010
|
Today’s blade server systems provide customers with platforms that can host many physical servers and potentially a hundred or more virtual servers. It is essential that these systems provide high-bandwidth connectivity in an any-to-any fashion across physical and virtual servers in order for customers to reap the benefits of blade-based virtualization and not encounter bandwidth-related application performance issues, particularly for I/O intensive applications such as ERP, CRM or database servers.
HP commissioned Tolly to benchmark the intra-chassis network throughput of its BladeSystem c7000 and compare that to a Cisco UCS 5100 system outfitted with comparable hardware.
|
|
|
|
Echelon Corporation #
210102
Echelon Networked Energy Services (NES) System Scalability Evaluation
Release date: 08 February 2010
|
Echelon Corporation commissioned Tolly to benchmark the scalability of its Networked Energy Services system and verify that its system could deliver comprehensive metering data from at least five million electric meters in under six hours.
This report will be of interest to utility companies in both the Americas and in Europe.
|
|
|
|
Allot Communications Ltd. #
210103
Allot Service Gateway Sigma: Carrier-class Performance and Feature Evaluation
Release date: 25 January 2010
|
Allot Communications, Ltd. commissioned Tolly to validate the application recognition performance and feature support of its Service Gateway Sigma (SG-Sigma) platform.
Tests measured the application recognition performance of the SG-Sigma platform while processing Internet Mix and standard IPv4 packet sizes. Tests also measured the performance of the SG-Sigma platform as a single chassis, as well as in a two-unit cluster. Feature certification tests focused on the ability of the SG-Sigma platform to identify asymmetric traffic patterns across different platforms in a two-unit cluster, and also the ability to ‘steer’ (selectively redirect) desired application traffic streams to internal and external service platforms. Finally tests validated the support for N+1 resiliency for the core controller modules of the SG-Sigma platform while handling application traffic.
|
|
|
|
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. #
210101
Brocade ServerIron ADX 1000 Application Switch with Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Acceleration
Release date: 20 January 2010
|
Brocade Communications, Inc. commissioned Tolly to validate the SSL and layer 7 performance of its ServerIron ADX 1000 application switch.
Test measured both transaction and data throughput for SSL (encrypted) and unencrypted layer 7 traffic. Results were compared with vendor-published results for similar products from Cisco Systems, Citrix Systems and F5 Networks. Cost per transaction and cost per Gigabit per second of throughput were calculated for all of the systems.
Tests were based on the Tolly Common Test Plan #1077 Application Switch Performance. (For more information see http://CommonTestPlan.org.)
|
|
|
|
Avaya, Inc. #
210115
Avaya ERS 4548 Layer 2 Switch Performance vs Cisco Catalyst 3560 and 3750
Release date: 15 January 2010
|
Avaya commissioned The Tolly Group to evaluate the company’s stackable Ethernet Routing Switch 4548GT-PWR to determine its Layer 2 switching performance, stack resiliency and cost-per-Gigabit of throughput delivered.
The Avaya ERS 4548GT-PWR is a member of Avaya’s ERS 4500 series of stackable switches that includes Fast Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) models designed to provide high-density desktop connectivity to mid and large enterprise customers’ wiring closets.
Engineers measured the bidirectional Layer 2 performance of the ERS 4548GTPWR in a stack configuration and in standalone mode. Engineers also measured the stackable performance and resiliency characteristics of the Avaya ERS 4548GTPWR in a five-switch stack against a Cisco Systems Inc. C3750G-48PS. Tolly Group engineers also measured the standalone performance of the Avaya ERS 4548GTPWR against the Cisco C3750G-48PS and Cisco C3560G-48PS switches to calculate the cost-per-Gigabit of throughput. The Cisco C3560G-48PS is not a stackable switch and was not used in the five-switch stack performance test.
Tests were conducted in May 2007.
|
|
|
|
Avaya, Inc. #
210118
Avaya ERS 5000 LAN Switching Performance vs. Cisco Catalyst and HP ProCurve
Release date: 15 January 2010
|
Avaya commissioned The Tolly Group to evaluate the Layer 2 switching performance, resiliency and ease of use delivered by the company’s stackable Ethernet Routing Switch 5000 series of switches. The Avaya Ethernet Routing Switch 5000 series of stackable switches tested include 24- and 48-port versions of 5510, 5520 and 5530 models.
Engineers measured the performance and resiliency characteristics of the Ethernet Routing Switch 5000 series switches against Cisco Systems, Inc. Catalyst 3750G switches and Hewlett-Packard Co. ProCurve 3400cl switches.
Tolly Group engineers measured the frame forwarding rate, latency and standard deviation of latency (jitter) characteristics of an eight-switch stack of Avaya switches against similarly configured stacks of Cisco Catalyst 3750G and HP ProCurve 3400cl switches. The engineers also examined the resiliency of an eight-switch stack by examining the impact of a single unit failure in a VLAN on the frame forwarding rate in a different VLAN in the stack. Engineers also measured the amount of usable Layer 2, zero-loss throughput and latency as experienced by users in a standalone switch. Finally, engineers measured the failover times of the Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) and Avaya's Split Multi-Link Trunking (SMLT) technologies.
Testing was conducted in September 2005.
|
|
|
|
Avaya, Inc. #
210116
Avaya Ethernet Routing Switch 4500 Layer 2 Performance and Resiliency
Release date: 15 January 2010
|
Avaya commissioned The Tolly Group to measure the Layer 2 switching performance and resiliency of the company’s stackable Ethernet Routing Switch 4500 series switches.
Tolly Group engineers measured the Layer 2, zero-loss throughput and standard deviation (Jitter) for an eight-unit stack. In addition, they reported the stackable switching capacity, or the total switching throughput “external” to users and “internal” between switch stack elements. Engineers also examined stack resiliency.
Testing was conducted in May 2007.
|
|
|
|
Avaya, Inc. #
210114
Avaya Ethernet Routing Switch 5510, 5520, 5530 Layer2 Performance, Resiliency and Ease of Use
Release date: 15 January 2010
|
Avaya commissioned The Tolly Group to evaluate the Layer 2 switching performance, resiliency and ease of use delivered by the company’s stackable Ethernet Routing Switch 5510, 5520 and 5530.
Tolly Group engineers measured the amount of usable Layer 2, zero-loss throughput as experienced by users. In addition, they reported the stackable switching capacity, or the total switching throughput “external” to users and “internal” between switch stack elements. The “internal” portion of this is not directly usable by end-user applications. Engineers also noted the latency and standard deviation (Jitter) of the three Nortel stackable switches in a variety of configurations and handing different traffic frame sizes.
Engineers also examined an Intelligent Auto Unit Replacement feature to verify that in the event of a switch failure within the stack, other switches continue to function and the dormant unit can be hot swapped without impacting stack activity. Lastly, Tolly Group engineers noted their observations regarding the ease-of-use in configuring and managing the Avaya stackable switches.
Testing was conducted in September 2005.
|
|
|
|
Avaya, Inc. #
210113
Avaya: Performance, Resiliency and TCO Comparison to Cisco/HP ProCurve Across Network Classes
Release date: 15 January 2010
|
Avaya commissioned The Tolly Group over the last two years to benchmark the performance, and evaluate the features/functions, of products that serve every facet of the enterprise network, from the data center to the remote branch office.
The aim was to measure, objectively, the performance, and evaluate the resiliency and TCO, of Avaya products versus products from Cisco Systems, Inc. and HP ProCurve. Tolly Group engineers examined products for the data center, for campus LANs, for wide area networks, branch offices, and also for application acceleration products to speed the performance of business applications.
This report provides a retrospective of Avaya-focused reports dating from 2005 to 2007, with emphasis on showing how Avaya addresses these factors to offer products that surpass competitors.
Testing was conducted from 2005 through 2007.
|
|
|
|
Avaya, Inc. #
210112
Avaya Ethernet Routing Swtich 8300 vs Cisco Catalyst 4500
Release date: 15 January 2010
|
Avaya commissioned Tolly to evaluate the Layer 2 switching performance, resiliency and ease of use delivered by the company’s chassis-based Ethernet Routing Switch (ERS) 8300 which is deployed in enterprise wiring closets, or as an aggregation or a core switch. The Avaya ERS 8300 modules tested include Switch Fabric Modules, plus 24- and 48-port GbE interface modules and a 10GbE module.
Engineers measured the performance, resiliency characteristics and power consumption of the ERS 8300 and a comparable Cisco Catalyst 4500 chassis-based switch with the maximum allowable equivalency in module configuration. Engineers also measured resilient performance between the Avaya ERS 8300 running switch clustering and the Cisco Catalyst 4500 running High Availability (HA) solutions.
Tests were conducted in January 2008.
|
|
|
|
Avaya, Inc. #
210111
Avaya Secure Router 4134 vs. Cisco ISR 3845
Release date: 15 January 2010
|
Tolly engineers examined the Avaya Secure Router 4134, a modular switch that Avaya designed to support a range of advanced network services – including IPv4/IPv6 routing, high-performance WAN, high-density Ethernet switching, Power over Ethernet, Voice over IP (VoIP) and security – in a single integrated platform. The Secure Router 4134 is designed to meet the needs of enterprise branch, regional or even headquarters sites.
Tolly engineers compared the performance and power consumption of the Secure Router 4134 against a commonly deployed Cisco ISR 3845, an integrated service router. While engineers measured throughput and power consumption, they also used the hands-on data to calculate initial deployment costs and operational costs over a five-year lifespan to demonstrate how the Avaya switch can provide an effective and cost-efficient option to the Cisco ISR 3845.
Hands-on testing of Avaya's Secure Router 4134 shows that the enterprise-class branch router not only delivers throughput that matches or exceeds the widely deployed Cisco ISR 3845, but it does so using less energy, and can reduce costs by 24% over the long-term.
Testing was conducted in September 2008.
|
|
|
|
Avaya, Inc. #
210110
Avaya Converged Data Network Solution Evaluation
Release date: 15 January 2010
|
Avaya commissioned Tolly to evaluate a converged network infrastructure for enterprise users utilizing a wide array of Avaya switches, routers and IP phones to determine the energy usage at critical areas of deployment and to project the energy costs of operating the equipment over a five-year span.
Tolly engineers compared the energy consumption of the Avaya products, in terms of the power to operate the devices, as well as the power consumed in relation to heat dissipation. Results were compared with products from Cisco Systems, Inc.
Tolly engineers measured the energy usage (in terms of watts) for switch operation and heat dissipation for switches deployed in large- and medium-sized enterprise networks, in mid-sized companies, and enterprise branch offices. Engineers also tested IP phone endpoints from both companies.
Tests were conducted in May 2008.
|
|
|
|
Avaya, Inc. #
210117
Avaya ERS 2500 Family LAN Switch vs Cisco Catalyst and HP ProCurve
Release date: 15 January 2010
|
Avaya commissioned The Tolly Group to evaluate the company’s Ethernet Routing Switch (ERS) 2500 switches to determine their frame forwarding rate, throughput, and cost-per-Gigabit of throughput delivered.
Engineers measured the ERS 2526T and ERS 2550T performance against Cisco Systems, Inc. Catalyst 2960-24TC and 48TC and ProCurve Networking by HP Switch 2626 and 2650 Layer 2/3 Switches.
Tests were conducted in March 2007.
|
|
|
|
Attachmate Corp. #
209147
Reflection for IBM 2008 Feature Evaluation with Microsoft Windows 7
Release date: 04 January 2010
|
Attachmate commissioned Tolly to evaluate the company’s Reflection for IBM 2008 terminal emulation software to verify its productivity features along with the Microsoft Windows 7 and Office integration.
Tolly Group engineers evaluated Reflection for IBM 2008 features and Windows integration comparing it to IBM Personal Communications 5.9.5.1 (PCOM), Micro Focus RUMBA 7.5.2 (RUMBA), and Open Text HostExplorer 2008 mainframe terminal emulation offerings. Attachmate Reflection for IBM 2008 delivered superior security, user productivity and Microsoft Windows 7 integration compared to IBM Personal Communications, Micro Focus RUMBA and Open Text HostExplorer 2008.
Download the free report.
|
|
|
|
3Com Corp. #
209143
H3C S5800/S5820X Series Flex Chassis 10GbE Switches Performance and Feature Validation
Release date: 14 December 2009
|
3Com commissioned Tolly to evaluate the feature set and performance of its H3C S5800/S5820X Series Flex Chassis 10GbE switches.
Engineers tested Layer 2 and Layer 3 throughput over Gigabit and 10Gigabit Ethernet ports and also evaluated feature support at Layer 2 and Layer 3 and certified more than 140 separate product features.
|
|
|
|
Wedge Networks #
209141
Wedge Networks Anti-virus Effectiveness vs. Fortinet
Release date: 15 November 2009
|
Wedge Networks commissioned Tolly to benchmark the anti-virus effectiveness and network performance of their BeSecure NDP-2040 Web Security Gateway and compare that with Fortinet's FortiGate 3600A security appliance.
Test were run using both the Extended WildList (August 2009) and the VX Heavens virus collections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VMware #
209140
VMware View 3 Premier VDI Implementation Comparison versus Microsoft
Release date: 03 November 2009
|
|
VMware commissioned Tolly to evaluate the installation of their VMware View 3 Premier versus Microsoft's VDI solution, as well as the process for deployment of virtual desktop environments.
The goal of the test was to help prospective users of the VMware and Microsoft virtual desktop infrastructure solutions better understand the process of setting up and managing the respective VDI environments while only using the tools provided by each vendor. The latest release offerings were used for each of the solutions
|
|
|
|
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. #
209150
Brocade ServerIron ADX 10000 10 GbE Performance and Scalability
Release date: 01 November 2009
|
Brocade Communications, Inc. commissioned Tolly to validate the performance of its ServerIron ADX 10000 application switch. This device was outfitted with 16 10 Gigabit Ethernet connections and ran 32 application processing cores.
Test covered L4-7 performance measuring transactions and connections per second, aggregate bandwidth, DNS query response capacity and resistance to distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks.
|
|
|
|
NETGEAR, Inc. #
209131
ProSecure™ UTM10 Unified Threat Management Appliance: Malware Detection Evaluation
Release date: 26 October 2009
|
|
NETGEAR commissioned Tolly to conduct a malware detection accuracy evaluation of the ProSecure UTM10, Fortinet FortiGate-60B, SonicWALL TZ 100, SonicWALL TZ 210 and WatchGuard Firebox Edge X55e UTM appliances.
Tests focused on the malware detection capabilities of the above mentioned UTM appliances using their default security policies, over the Web traffic and email vectors using HTTP, POP3 and SMTP protocols. Test malware samples consisted of The WildList Organization International’s latest WildList (a list of viruses and worms found propagating on the Internet) along with other major Win32 malware.
Download the free report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunbelt Software, Inc. #
209138
Sunbelt Software VIPRE Enterprise 3.1: Anti-virus Scanning Performance
Release date: 28 September 2009
|
Sunbelt Software commissioned Tolly to evaluate the anti-virus scanning performance and system resource utilization of its VIPRE Enterprise 3.1 anti-virus product in comparison to McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.7i and Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 Small Business Edition products.
Tests focused on measuring the memory and CPU utilization of the products under test during various stages of product operation: at idle, with the product GUI open, during an on-demand full-system scan, etc.
|
|
|
|
Akamai Technologies, Inc. #
209121
Akamai IP Application Accelerator Service: Real-world Citrix Virtual Desktop
Release date: 21 September 2009
|
Akamai commissioned Tolly to evaluate the performance benefits of using Akamai IP Application Accelerator service when using a real-world deployment of the Citrix Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) solution
Tests evaluated the end-user experience when accessing the VDI solution over the standard Internet and compared the experience to that while using optimized delivery over the Internet using Akamai's IP Application Accelerator Service
|
|
|
|
Lumension, Inc #
209135
Lumension Vulnerability Management versus Microsoft Windows Server Update Services (WSUS)
Release date: 18 September 2009
|
Lumension commissioned Tolly to evaluate the total cost of ownership (TCO) associated with managing system vulnerabilities on Windows environments and to compare that with free Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) offered by Microsoft.
Tests explored patching Microsoft and non-Microsoft applications, discovering new and/or unauthorized clients, CVE patching, software removal and other areas.
Download the free report.
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134
Nortel CS 1000 VoIP Solution: Power Consumption versus Cisco MCS 7835
Release date: 08 September 2009
|
Nortel commissioned Tolly to evaluate the power consumption of their CS 1000 VoIP solution versus the Cisco MCS 7835 VoIP solution.
Tolly engineers monitored and recorded the power draw of all critical infrastructure components of the Solutions Under Test (SUTs) in an idle state. These observations were then extrapolated to obtain the operational costs, power savings, and the resultant CO2 emission savings for a 1,000-user deployment.
|
|
|
|
Anue Systems #
209128
Anue 5200 Net Tool Optimizer - Performance and Feature Evaluation
Release date: 04 September 2009
|
Anue Systems, Inc. commissioned Tolly to evaluate the performance and features of its tool and SPAN port aggregator.
Engineers validated wire-speed performance across various combinations of 1Gbps and 10Gbps Ethernet links. Additionally, engineers validated a range of filtering and broadcast capabilities.
Tests were conducted in September 2008.
|
|
|
|
VMware #
209119
Virtual Desktop Implementation: VMware View 3 Premier vs. Citrix XenDesktop Enterprise 3.0
Release date: 31 August 2009
|
Testers set out to build and deploy a virtual desktop environment capable of supporting 30 to 40 users. Engineers layered the virtual desktop capabilities onto a pre-existing virtualization environment to serve as a starting point. Once virtual desktops were built, testers conducted an informal examination of application responsiveness for LAN-based VDI users when running traditional business applications, as well as when accessing high-definition multimedia.
.
The goal of the test was to help prospective users of the VMware and Citrix desktop virtualization solutions better understand the process of setting up and managing the respective VDI environments. Current release offerings were used for each of the solutions.
The VMware View 3 VDI solution deployed more simply and more rapidly than Citrix XenDesktop 3.0. VMware provided more comprehensive, efficient image and storage management of virtual desktops. It provides end-users with a quality of experience on the LAN that matches or exceeds that offered by the Citrix solution.
Download the free report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134RU
Сравнение решений IP-телефонии Nortel CS 1000 Сравнение решений IP-телефонии Nortel CS 1000
Release date: 30 August 2009
|
|
Nortel поручило Tolly оценить расход энергии их разрешения 1000 VoIP CS против разрешения Cisco MCS 7835 VoIP.
связи с этим специалисты компании Tolly отслеживали и регистрировали энергопотребление всех критических компонентов инфраструктуры тестируемого решения в режиме бездействия. Затем эти наблюдения были экстраполированы для получения данных об эксплуатационных расходах, экономии электроэнергии, а также уменьшении объема выбросов углекислого газа для системы, развертываемой на 1 000 пользователей.
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134AR
ةحفصلاتنرتنلإا لوكوتورب ربع لاصتلال CS 1000 لترون ماظن#
Release date: 30 August 2009
|
ديق تنرتنلإا لوكوتورب ربع لاصتلال لترون فتاوه تاو 3.14 غلب ةقاط طسوتم تبحس رابتخلاا ةبوحسلما ةقاطلا رادقم ثلث لداعي رادقلما اذهو يتلاو وكسيس نم اهتلايثم فتاوهلا للاخ نم ىلع .تاو 9.33 ةقاطلل اهكلاهتسا طسوتم غلب جئاتنلا هذه ةمجرت نكيم ،تاونس 5 ةرتف ىدم يف فتاه لكل رلاود 25 هرادقم ريفوت ةروص يف
Nortel commissioned Tolly to evaluate the power consumption of their CS 1000 VoIP solution versus the Cisco MCS 7835 VoIP solution.
Tolly engineers monitored and recorded the power draw of all critical infrastructure components of the Solutions Under Test (SUTs) in an idle state. These observations were then extrapolated to obtain the operational costs, power savings, and the resultant CO2 emission savings for a 1,000-user deployment.
|
|
|
|
3Com Corp. #
209120
H3C S12500 Data Center Core Switch: Performance, Functionality & Cisco Interoperability
Release date: 28 August 2009
|
3Com commissioned Tolly to evaluate the feature set, performance and Cisco interoperability of the 3Com H3C S12500 Data Center Core Switch.
Engineers tested Layer 2 and Layer 3 throughput using both Gigabit and 10Gigabit Ethernet. Engineers also illustrated interoperability at layers 2 and 3 and using MPLS with Cisco switches.
Engineers also certified more than 120 separate product features.
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134PT
Solução VoIP CS 1000 da Nortel
Release date: 26 August 2009
|
|
Nortel comissão Tolly avaliar o consumo de potência de sua solução 1000 de VoIP do CS contra a solução de Cisco MCS 7835 VoIP.
Os engenheiros da Tolly observaram e registaram o consume de energia de todos os components críticos das infra-estruturas das Soluções Sob Teste num modo inactivo. Estas observações foram extrapoladas para obter os custos operacionais, poupanças de energia e as resultantes reduções de emissões de CO2 para uma utilização eficaz de 1.000 utilizadores
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134JP
Nortel CS 1000 VoIP ソリューション: Cisco MCS 7835 VoIP ソリューションと比較した消費電力評価
Release date: 26 August 2009
|
|
NortelはTollyをCSの1000年のVoIPの解決のパワー消費量を対Cisco MCS 7835 VoIPの解決評価するように依託した。
VoIP ソリューションの多くの機能は、1 日の大半は休止状態に あり、必要時にのみ稼動しています。このため、Tolly のエンジ ニアはアイドリング状態にある 被試験ソリューション (SUT) の すべての重要インフラストラク チャ コンポーネントをモニタ
リングし、消費電力を記録。モ ニタリングの結果に基づき、運 用コスト、節電量、1,000 名のユーザーあたりの CO2 排出削減 量の推定値を算出しています。
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134IT
Soluzione CS 1000 VoIP di Nortel
Release date: 26 August 2009
|
|
Nortel ha incaricato Tolly di valutare l'assorbimento di corrente di energia della loro soluzione 1000 di VoIP del CS contro la soluzione di Cisco MCS 7835 VoIP.
Per questo motivo i tecnici di Tolly hanno monitorato e registrato l’assorbimento di corrente di tutti i component essenziali delle soluzioni sottoposte a test in uno stato “a riposo”. Queste
rilevazioni sono state quindi estrapolate al fine di ottenere dati sui costi operativi, sul risparmio energetico e sul conseguente risparmio delle emissioni di CO2 per 1000 utenti.
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134FR
Solution voix sur IP CS 1000 de Nortel : évaluation de la puissance consommée des solutions voix
Release date: 26 August 2009
|
|
Nortel a commissionné Tolly évaluer la puissance de leur solution 1000 de VoIP de CS contre la solution de support de consoles multiples 7835 VoIP de Cisco.
De nombreux éléments d’une solution de téléphonie IP restent en veille une grande partie de la journée et ne s’activent qu’en cas d’appel. C’est pourquoi les ingénieurs de Tolly ont contrôlé et enregistré la puissance absorbée de tous les composants essentiels de l’infrastructure d’une des solutions testées au repos. Ces observations ont ensuite été extrapolées afin d’obtenir les coûts d’exploitation, l’économie d’énergie et les économies de CO2 en résultant pour un deployment comprenant 1000 utilisateurs.
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134ES
Solución VoIP CS 1000 de Nortel frente Cisco
Release date: 26 August 2009
|
|
Nortel comisionó Tolly evaluar el consumo de energía de su solución CS 1000 de VoIP contra la solución de Cisco MCS 7835 VoIP.
Los ingenieros de Tolly han supervisado y registrado el consume eléctrico de todos los componentes de infraestructura críticos de las soluciones probadas ( SUT ) en estado en esciones se han extrapolado con el fin de obtener los costes operativos, el ahorro de energía y el ahorro de emisiones de CO2 resultante de un despliegue para 1.000 usuarios.
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134DE
Nortel CS 1000 VoIP-Lösung
Release date: 26 August 2009
|
|
Nortel gab Tolly in Auftrag, die Leistungsaufnahme ihrer CS VoIP Lösung 1000 gegen die Lösung Cisco-MCS 7835 VoIP auszuwerten.
Viele Elemente einer VoIP-Lösung bleiben tagsüber größtenteils inaktiv und warden erst aktiv, wenn ein Anruf getätigt wird. Aus diesem Grund überwachten und erfassten die Tolly-Ingenieure die Leistungsaufnahme aller kritischen Infrastructurkomponentener untersuchten Lösungen im Ruhezustand. Diese Beobachtungen wurden dann extrapoliert, um die Betriebskosten, die Stromersparnis und die sich daraus ergebende Reduzierung des CO2- Ausstoßes für eine Implementierung mit 1.000 Benutzern zu ermitteln.
|
|
|
|
Symantec Corporation #
209132ES
Symantec: Desempeño de recuperación y respaldo de Exchange frente a CA ARCserve Backup 12.5
Release date: 26 August 2009
|
Microsoft Exchange es una aplicación esencial para las empresas de hoy en día. Los problemas con el servidor Exchange afectan directamente a los resultados empresariales. Recuperar rápidamente la base de datos de Exchange o carpetas o mensajes individuales es esencial para que su negocio vuelva a estar en línea y generar ingresos.
Las soluciones de copias de seguridad de Symantec ofrecen importantes ahorros en términos de tiempo con respecto a CA ARCserve Backup en toda una serie de situaciones de copia de seguridad y recuperación de Microsoft Exchange Server.
|
|
|
|
Symantec Corporation #
209133ES
Symantec: VMware frente a CA ARCserve Backup 12.5
Release date: 26 August 2009
|
|
El uso de servidores virtuales crece rápidamente a medida que las empresas reconocen los ahorros de costos que ofrece la virtualización de sus entornos. No obstante, los entornos virtuales introducen un nuevo nivel de complejidad a la hora realizar copias de seguridad y recuperar los datos.
Symantec Backup Exec y Symantec Veritas NetBackup simplifican la protección de entornos virtuales y ofrecen copias de seguridad y recuperaciones de datos más rápidas.
|
|
|
|
Nortel #
209134NL
Een evaluatie van het energieverbruik van de Nortel CS 1000 VoIPoplossing
Release date: 26 August 2009
|
|
Nortel droeg Tolly op om de machtsconsumptie van hun Cs 1000 oplossing VoIP tegenover MCS 7835 van Cisco oplossing te evalueren VoIP.
Veel elementen van een VoIPapplicatie blijven het grootste gedeelte van de dag in de sluimerstand en worden alleen actief wanneer er een telefoongesprek gevoerd wordt.
Om deze reden hebben de technici van Tolly het energieverbruik van alle essentiële componenten van de geteste applicaties zonder actieve gesprekken gemeten. Deze gegevens zijn daarna geëxtrapoleerd om te komen tot een berekening van de operationele kosten, energiebesparing endedaaruitresulte ren de vermindering van CO2-uitstoot voor een opstelling met 1000 gebruikers.
Download the free report.
|
|
|
|
Symantec Corporation #
209132
Symantec: Exchange Backup & Recovery vs. CA
Release date: 07 August 2009
|
Symantec Corporation commissioned Tolly to evaluate the backup and recovery performance of Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 & Symantec Veritas NetBackup 6.5.3 and compare them with CA ARCserve 12.5.
Testing evaluated backup performance and recovery performance for the full Exchange 2007 database as well as individual mailboxes and messages.
Download the free test report.
|
|
|
|
Symantec Corporation #
209133
Symantec: VMware ESX 3.5 Environment Data Protection vs. CA
Release date: 07 August 2009
|
Symantec Corporation commissioned Tolly to evaluate the data protection performance of Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 & Symantec Veritas NetBackup 6.5.3 and compare them with CA ARCserve 12.5 in a VMware ESX 3.5 environment.
Testing evaluated backup performance and recovery performance for the full VMware ESX virtual machines as well as individual files residing within a given virtual machine.
Download the free test report.
|
|
|
|
Citrix Systems, Inc. #
209127
Citrix NetScaler vs. F5 BIG-IP: Latency Benchmarking
Release date: 30 June 2009
|
Citrix Systems commissioned Tolly to benchmark the latency of its NetScaler MPX17000 application delivery controller and compare that to the F5 BIG-IP 8800.
Tests were run using the latest software from both vendors with each appliance outfitted with its maximum number of 10GbE interfaces.
Ixia network testing equipment was used to drive various loads ranging from 1,200 to 1.2 million concurrent connections.
The Citrix NetScaler appliance consistently delivered significantly lower latency than the F5 BIG-IP across the range of tests.
Download the free report below.
|
|
|
|
Symantec Corporation #
209137
Webcast: Overview of Symantec Data Protection vs. EMC and CommVault
Release date: 29 June 2009
|
Symantec commissioned Tolly to benchmark Symantec solutions vs EMC and CommVault in Microsoft Exchange 2007 and Vmware ESX 3.5 environments.
The results of the studies can be found in Tolly documents 209117, 209118, 209123 & 209124.
View the on-demand webcast with Kevin Tolly presenting the study results by clicking on the link below which will take you to the Symantec website.
Symantec webcast registration page.
|
|
|
|
Tolly Common RFP, LLC #
RFP1080
Tolly Common Test Plan: LAN Switch Power Consumption
Release date: 18 June 2009
|
The Tolly Common Test Plan series is a series of "Best Practices" Guides that provide field-tested product evaluation methodologies.
More information about this test plan can be found on the Tolly Common Test Plan LAN Switch Power overview page
|
|
|
|
Symantec Corporation #
209123
Symantec: Exchange Backup & Recovery vs. CommVault
Release date: 14 June 2009
|
Symantec Corporation commissioned Tolly to evaluate the backup and recovery performance of Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 & Symantec Veritas NetBackup 6.5.3 and compare them with CommVault Simpana 8.
Testing evaluated backup performance and recovery performance for the full Exchange 2007 database as well as individual mailboxes and messages.
Download the free test report.
|
|
|
|
Citrix Systems, Inc. #
209105
Evaluating Remote Access: Citrix GoToMyPC Corporate vs. Traditional VPN
Release date: 12 June 2009
|
Citrix Online commissioned Tolly to evaluate two possible models for implementing secure remote desktop access: Citrix's GoToMyPC Corporate software as a service (SaaS) versus provisioning remote desktop access using traditional virtual private network (VPN) technology as the basic connectivity enabler.
Tolly evaluated key aspects of both approaches and also built out a TCO model for deployments of 50, 100 and 500 users using each approach.
Download the free report below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symantec Corporation #
209125
CommVault Simpana - Upgrading from Version 7 to Version 8
Release date: 31 May 2009
|
Symantec Corporation commissioned Tolly to evaluate the data protection performance of Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 & Symantec Veritas NetBackup 6.5.3 and compare them with the CommVault Simpana solution.
Testing commenced using CommVault Simpana 7 which was the "then current" version of the product. While testing was in progress, Version 8 was released. It was decided to upgrade the environment to Simpana 8 to conduct the production testing. (Reports on that testing are also found on tolly.com.)
This report describes the problems encountered when attempting to migrate to a newer version.
Download the free test report below.
|
|
|
|
Red Condor, Inc. #
209108
Red Condor Message Assurance Gateway 2700 Anti-Spam vs. Google Message Security (Postini)
Release date: 30 May 2009
|
Red Condor commissioned Tolly to evaluate the anti-spam effectiveness of its Message Assurance Gateway 2700 against Google Message Security (Postini).
Testing focused on the anti-spam effectiveness in terms of spam detection percentage, spam error percentage and false positive rate of the solutions under test during a calendar week of testing per solution, while deployed in the live corporate network of The Tolly Group.
The testing was conducted in accordance with Tolly Common Test Plan #1058, Anti-spam Gateway v1.0.
That document is available for license and you can find more information about it on the
Tolly Common Test Plan website.
Click below to download the free test report.
|
|
|